Business Model

Phase 1 Business Model

Phase 1 raises $85,000 to convert two existing steel grain silos into two bookable guest suites, with major spend gated behind land-use, OSSF, floodplain/CoC, permit, inspection, and launch-readiness controls.

Still Haven financial snapshot summary showing Phase 1 economics, use of funds, and total ask.
Financial snapshot. Phase 1 is underwritten around two silo suites, not a speculative full-campus rollout.
Entry asset base Land + silo shell

Site direction and existing structures narrow the first-phase scope to utility activation and two bookable silo suites.

Phase 1 ask $85,000

Current capital is restricted to utilities, structural preparation, interior completion, and operating readiness for two silo suites.

Expansion target $250,000

This is a contingent long-range target, not the basis for the current Phase 1 underwriting case.

Expansion gate Later expansion only after proof

Future development is dependent on operating data, reserve coverage, and repeated demand, not concept projections.

The Phase 1 model in six views.

Capital scope, timing, NOI scenarios, budget line items, permit gates, and packet-request language from the final booklet.

What is the Phase 1 business case?

Two silo suites first. Real booking proof before any later buildout.

  • Uses an existing land-and-silo base instead of underwriting a full ground-up hospitality launch
  • Tests two differentiated short-stay suites before any later expansion commitment
  • Directs capital to enabling infrastructure, safe completion, and launch readiness instead of early overbuild
  • Keeps future development dependent on measured performance rather than headline projections
  • Keeps the public underwriting case consistent across every review path inside the Phase 1 scope
Still Haven Year 1 operating plan summary showing ADR, occupancy, gross revenue, operating expense, net income, and operating proof gate.
Concept-only Year 1 operating plan summary showing how two activated silo suites can be evaluated before any broader expansion is considered.

Which guest segments support the two Phase 1 silo suites?

The two Phase 1 silo suites are aimed at guests who value privacy, design, and a strong sense of place.

Primary segment Mission fit

Veterans seeking respite

Still Haven's origin story and quiet setting create strong narrative fit for veterans looking for restorative, non-clinical space.

Premium leisure Rate support

Wellness travelers

Guests already paying for boutique cabins, glamping, and nature escapes are a logical fit for the design-forward silo experience.

Small groups Higher spend

Corporate retreats

Leadership off-sites, founder resets, and small team retreats create demand for buyouts, workshops, and weekday occupancy smoothing.

Geographic reach Central Texas

Regional demand base

Central Texas provides a nearby guest pool while still allowing the property to market quiet and distance.

How is the two Phase 1 silo suites expected to find guests?

The Phase 1 case assumes practical Central Texas hospitality channels, not a large brand-marketing budget.

Short-stay platforms

Marketplace distribution can provide the first booking base while the direct audience is still developing.

Direct site + search

Still Haven pages targeting Central Texas searches support direct discovery over time.

Referral partners

Veteran networks, local wellness referrals, and mission-aligned community introductions can support qualified stays after launch.

Repeat demand

Acquisition efficiency improves only after the two Phase 1 silo suites demonstrates guest satisfaction, reliable turnovers, and rate discipline.

Capital request and Phase 1 proof

Phase 1 capital is intentionally narrow: two operating silo suites, enabling infrastructure, and one real booking cycle.

Phase 1 proves

Build feasibility, guest willingness to pay, turnover practicality, utility reliability, and reserve discipline before any second-unit decision is taken seriously.

Source mix

Phase 1 keeps the same operating scope regardless of the capital path or instrument used to close the gap.

Current ask

$85,000 is tied to two silo suites, one site, and one operating proof cycle.

Long-range target

$250,000 remains contingent and is not current-phase underwriting.

Public terms boundary

Public pages summarize the project and diligence path. Legal and return terms are not posted publicly.

Future revenue layers

Later additions such as guided sessions or small retreats are optional and do not drive the initial case.

Expansion discipline

Phase 2 only becomes reviewable after performance gates are met, documented, and repeated.

How does the $85,000 Phase 1 ask allocate?

Each dollar ties back to one outcome: opening two lawful, bookable silo suites and observing a real operating cycle.

Phase 1 excludes

  • Phase 2 expansion before proof
  • Broad retreat programming before operations stabilize
  • Public return terms before private written review

What does the conservative planning range look like?

These cases reconcile ADR, occupancy, room revenue, operating expense, and reserve logic directly.

What supports the unit-level case in Central Texas?

The two Phase 1 silo suites are underwritten like a small hospitality asset with room-revenue-only assumptions and a clear reserve posture.

Fixed / committed costs

Utilities, insurance, core site upkeep, compliance-related upkeep, and baseline operating readiness continue whether occupancy is high or low.

Variable costs

Cleaning, consumables, payment and platform fees, guest supplies, and maintenance move with actual stay volume.

Expected net operating posture

Base-case gross revenue of $83,038 less annual OpEx of $19,800 and a 3% platform fee produces projected annual NOI of $60,746. Booklet downside NOI is $17,375.

Competitive positioning

Still Haven is differentiated by adaptive silo reuse, veteran-owned mission fit, and a Central Texas setting without relying on luxury-resort pricing logic.

Risk / dependency map

Utilities, permit path, contractor sequencing, launch readiness, and repeated guest demand remain the main dependencies before expansion is even reviewable.

Later expansion rule

Phase 2 is not part of this capital raise. Later expansion requires permit and compliance gates, executed land-use terms, ground-level silo photo proof, 55%-60% trailing six-month occupancy, base-case NOI within 15% of model, and current Phase 1 reserves.

What has to happen before later expansion is reviewable?

Later expansion is gated by proof, not by concept drawings or headline demand assumptions.

Phase 1 remains viable only if the project stays disciplined under the base case discipline.

The final booklet uses 9.7 combined nights/month at base OpEx as a public operating reference. Downside NOI remains projected positive at $17,375, but all figures remain projections and are not guaranteed.

Investor Memo